Scots' Liberties

| | Comments (15) | TrackBacks (0)

The Scottish executive is shortly due to announce the stance it will be taking on gay marriage - before the situational deaf start beating themselves and pulling out their hair, the term actually refers, in this case, to partnership rights and next-of-kin status - north of the border.

Apparently there are three routes they can take; ignore the issue entirely, which unlikely to be the case; make changes to Scots law, which would probably be the best thing, whether or not it works in favour of gay people; allow Westminster to legislate on behalf of the entire Kingdom.

The latter would pretty much be a guarantee, as that is the direction that legislation is taking in the capital; my reason for favouring the second option is that the Scots are in a good position to demonstrate again the autonomy that they have been arguing towards since time began (1707), itself a great issue. They have, in the past, also demonstrated a great maturity in coming to decisions that govern minority issues fairly, something England has had difficulty trusting them with; I have some faith and hope that they can pull this off independently of England, preferably in our favour.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Scots' Liberties.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://stairs.happenchance.com/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/315

15 Comments

Phil said:

What would you know, filthy Sassenach scum?!

Didn't time begin a century earlier than you claim?

ksquare said:

What's a Sassenach?

Phil said:

What's a Sassenach? Have a look at the following site:

http://www.royal-stuarts.org/sassenach.htm

Stairs said:

According to Phil, probably not, though I am inclined to say "yes".

You know, Phil talks just like the person in above link, which makes him very hard to understand - we can only communicate on paper these days as the funny accent is easier to read, though he can sometimes imitate true English, as here, with a little effort.

Phil said:

Wee, sleekit, cowrin, tim'rous beastie,

O, what a panic's in thy breastie!

Thou need na start awa sae hasty,

Wi' bickering brattle!

I wad be laith to rin an' chase thee

Wi' murd'ring pattle!

Stairs said:

Ah dinnae kin fit yer sayin' y'auld scrueball!

Chris said:

If we gay people are allowed to marry, think of the new revenue opportunities it will bring for flower shops... We'd go to town!

Chris said:

BTW I quickly skimmed back through some of your past posts and came across your Dante's Hell Test, or whatever.... I'm 7th level too. let me know when you die, maybe we can hook up down there.

ksquare said:

So... Weirdness, question, question, answer, snide remark, more weirdness, stairs losing his marbles and off topicness (by the terms of this comments section anyway). Okay. I think I need to go to bed.

matt said:

That sounds like a pretty good haul to me. What's this "off topicness" of which you speak? I'm not familiar with the concept...

Chris said:

Add me to your AIM list... dmonkey1000

ksquare said:

'off topicness' - The intrusion of miscellany into the conversation, causing the conversation usually to veer more erratically off into other directions.

Speaking of conversations:

http://www.kottke.org/03/09/030911bilingual_co.html

And interesting discussion about bilingual 'code switching' ... basically like me telling Stairs "Some people so bodoh you know? Tak tau even what bilingual codeswitching is about. Pei sehlah."

So there. ;)

Stairs said:

Ah, but for miscellany to intrude here, you'd have to be reading someone else's journal; I'm the most erratic person within ten feet of myself, so it's only proper that this be reflected online.

I liked the entry you linked to above; it sounds like many people I know; my mother will chat with her family in English and Urdu, interchanging freely "Ah, 'ma? Ap ke seheh? Oh, I'm fine etc. etc." She can do this in Burmese too, and when she's in the middle of it all, I'll sit nearby, grinning like a mad thing.

Like you, I assume, I invariably speak terribly bastardised Manglish with my friends back home, but that isn't foreign to me; I never learned Burmese or Urdu from my mother, something that I regret enormously (and begrudge my father for his being English), so hearing her do it in a tongue that I don't speak is totally absorbing.

Anyway, we can't cakap Melayu ini, lah, especially to call orang-orang ini bodoh. Saya cinta bahasa melayu, tetapi kita mesti cakap inggeris ini, ok?

ksquare said:

Okay, the 'bodoh' part was probably a bit much. Sorry. My brain doesn't function after working hours. Bastardised Manglish is fun. Especially if you're Chinese, then it comes with several dialects.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Stairs published on September 10, 2003 8:41 AM.

07/09/03 was the previous entry in this blog.

as soon as possible is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01a